Author name: Dr Heinz

References: Full Case files available online: [ https://www.dhillonlaw.com/lawsuits/ariadna-jacob-v-the-new-york-times/ ] Alleged Defamatory Article: Lorenz, T (2020) “NY Times: Trying To Make […]

I conducted an extensive analysis of the defamation lawsuit involving notable journalist Taylor Lorenz from the Washington Post, formerly from the New York Times, and Ariadna Jacob. Recently, a motion to dismiss was filed, accompanied by a letter from Taylor Lorenz and a response letter from Ari Jacob. I examined the cited legal precedents mentioned in an attempt to shed light on their respective arguments and provided insights on potential outcomes from the presiding judge.

On this episode, we take a look at the declarations that have been made in support of Ariadna Jacob by her former TikTok talent client, Adam Cohen, and Kyle Offerice, who witnessed Taylor Lorenz’s falsehoods as she copied from an article he wrote that he declared was false!

Throughout the series, we meticulously analyze each defamatory statement put forth by the lawyers representing Ariadna Jacob. We cross-reference these statements with the article in question, aiming to grasp the comprehensive context in which the events unfolded. By engaging in this thorough examination, we seek to provide our audience with a comprehensive understanding of the complexities surrounding this captivating case.

On this episode, we explore the second amended complaint filed by the plaintiff, ariadna jacob, which includes some very damning evidence for taylor lorenz and poses questions such as, what is the fine line between the truth and knowing of a truth!

In this three-part series, we delve into a fascinating defamation case that has captivated attention. It centers around the clash between Taylor Lorenz, a well-known journalist associated with the Washington Post, and Ariadna Jacob. The series explores the intricate details of the case, uncovering a web of defamatory statements and grave allegations that have come to light